home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT0498>
- <title>
- Feb. 20, 1989: America Abroad
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Feb. 20, 1989 Betrayal:Marine Spy Scandal
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 45
- America Abroad
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Trouble on the Home Front
- </p>
- <p>By Strobe Talbott
- </p>
- <p> The most frequently uttered five syllables in Washington
- these days are "bipartisanship." That tender word is part of the
- vocabulary of the honeymoon between a new Congress and a new
- Administration, especially when the pillow talk turns to foreign
- policy. It is meant to conjure up the happy image of Republicans
- and Democrats hand in hand at the water's edge. Actually, the
- word is doubly misleading, both in its evocation of the distant
- past and in its implications for the near future.
- </p>
- <p> The brief heyday of bipartisanship was in the Truman years,
- when a Democratic Administration enlisted the support of a
- pre-World War II isolationist Republican, Senator Arthur
- Vandenberg, in the postwar reconstruction of Europe. But
- Vandenberg later joined in highly partisan attacks on the
- Democrats for "losing" China and "letting" the Soviet Union
- acquire the atom bomb.
- </p>
- <p> Nor has disagreement between the Republicans and Democrats
- been the principal obstacle to effective foreign policy in
- recent years. Rather, the source of poison and paralysis has
- more often been ideologically motivated obstructionism within
- each of the two parties.
- </p>
- <p> Jimmy Carter had far more difficulty with another Democrat,
- the late Henry Jackson, than with most Republicans. Likewise,
- Ronald Reagan's diplomatic appointees encountered more
- opposition in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee from the
- G.O.P.'s own Jesse Helms than from the soporifically temperate
- senior Democrat, Claiborne Pell. In 1985 Helms held up the
- confirmation of Reagan's Ambassador to China, Winston Lord, for
- more than three months, preventing him from being at his post
- when then Vice President George Bush visited Beijing.
- </p>
- <p> Lord's main sin was that he had served as a close aide to
- Henry Kissinger, whom Helms Republicans and Jackson Democrats
- will forever blame for detente and SALT. Now that is
- bipartisanship.
- </p>
- <p> For nearly a decade, Bush has been suppressing and denying
- his own centrist roots. In an interview with TIME on the eve of
- his Inauguration, Bush was asked whether he was a moderate.
- "No!" he snapped, reacting to the label as though it were a
- synonym for wimp. He protests too much, out of fear of the
- right. Helms & Co. sense that fear and mean to play on it.
- </p>
- <p> On the surface, Secretary of State James Baker's
- confirmation hearings last month were a love feast. Helms
- exuded courtesy, calling Baker "Secretary Jim." But the North
- Carolina Senator and his allies used the occasion to declare
- themselves on some potentially troublesome issues: Salvadoran
- rightist Roberto D'Aubuisson may be an admirable patriot who has
- got a bum rap for the death squads, and Winnie Mandela is a
- terrorist.
- </p>
- <p> Meanwhile, Republican hard-liners have been sniping at the
- appointments of a number of experienced middle-of-the-roaders,
- particularly ones with Kissinger connections, such as Baker's
- chosen deputy, Lawrence Eagleburger. Another target of
- opposition has been Lord, whom Eagleburger wanted to be
- Assistant Secretary for East Asia. And as a sop to the right, a
- former Helms protege, Richard McCormack, got the job of Under
- Secretary for Economic Affairs, instead of almost everyone's
- first choice, Robert Hormats, a highly regarded international
- trade specialist.
- </p>
- <p> Behind the talk of interparty cooperation, the lines are
- being drawn for some nasty intraparty fights -- over personnel
- now and policy later. The toughest test that Bush and Baker
- face on the home front of their foreign policy will not be
- whether they are able to sit down and compromise with the
- Democrats but whether they are able to stand up to their fellow
- Republicans.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-